J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinze, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mangun, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heinze, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mangun, G. R.

The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol 10, 485-498, Copyright © 1998 by The MIT Press


ARTICLES

Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study

H. J. Heinze, H. Hinrichs, M. Scholz, W. Burchert and G. R. Mangun

The neural mechanisms of hierarchical stimulus processing were investigated using a combined event-related potentials (ERPs) and positron emission tomography (PET) approach. Healthy subjects were tested under two conditions that involved selective or divided attention between local and global levels of hierarchical letter stimuli in order to determine whether and where hemispheric differences might exist in the processing of local versus global information. When attention was divided between global and local levels, the N2 component of the ERPs (260- to 360-msec latency) elicited by the target stimuli showed asymmetries in amplitude over the two hemispheres. The N2 to local targets was larger over the left hemisphere, but the N2 to global targets tended to be slightly larger over the right hemisphere. However, the shorter-latency, sensory-evoked P1 component (90- to 150-msec latency) was not different for global versus local targets under conditions of divided attention. In contrast, during selective attention to either global or local targets, asymmetries in the N2 component were not observed. But under selective attention conditions, the sensory-evoked P1 components in the extrastriate cortex were enlarged for global versus local attention. Increased regional cerebral blood flow in the posterior fusiform gyrus bilaterally was observed in the PET data during selective attention to either global or local targets, but neither these nor the P1 component showed any tendency toward hemispheric difference for global versus local attention. Neither were there any activations observed in the parietal lobe during selective attention to global versus local targets. Together these data indicate that early sensory inputs are not modulated to gate global versus local information differentially into the two hemispheres. Rather, later stages of processing that may be asymmetrically organized in the left and right hemispheres operate in parallel to process global and local aspects of complex stimuli (i.e., the N2 effect of the ERPs). This pattern of results supports models proposing that spatial frequency analysis is only asymmetric at higher stages of perceptual processing and not at the earliest stages of visual cortical analysis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Wetzel, F. W. Ohl, and H. Scheich
Global versus local processing of frequency-modulated tones in gerbils: An animal model of lateralized auditory cortex functions
PNAS, May 6, 2008; 105(18): 6753 - 6758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Rose, T. Sommer, and C. Buchel
Integration of Local Features to a Global Percept by Neural Coupling
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1522 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J.-M. Hopf, S. J. Luck, K. Boelmans, M. A. Schoenfeld, C. N. Boehler, J. Rieger, and H.-J. Heinze
The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception.
J. Neurosci., March 29, 2006; 26(13): 3532 - 3540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Koivisto, A. Revonsuo, and M. Lehtonen
Independence of Visual Awareness from the Scope of Attention: an Electrophysiological Study
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2006; 16(3): 415 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. F. S. Rushworth, R. E. Passingham, and A. C. Nobre
Components of Switching Intentional Set
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2002; 14(8): 1139 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. M. Murray, G. R. Wylie, B. A. Higgins, D. C. Javitt, C. E. Schroeder, and J. J. Foxe
The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Illusory Contour Processing: Combined High-Density Electrical Mapping, Source Analysis, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2002; 22(12): 5055 - 5073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Sasaki, N. Hadjikhani, B. Fischl, A. K. Liu, S. Marrett, A. M. Dale, and R. B. H. Tootell
Local and global attention are mapped retinotopically in human occipital cortex
PNAS, February 13, 2001; 98(4): 2077 - 2082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
G. R. Fink, J. C. Marshall, P. W. Halligan, and R. J. Dolan
Neuronal Activity in Early Visual Areas during Global and Local Processing: A Comment on Heinze, Hinrichs, Scholz, Burchert, and Mangun
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2000; 12(2): 355 - 356.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
G. R. Mangun, H. J. Heinze, M. Scholz, and H. Hinrichs
Neural Activity in Early Visual Areas During Global and Local Processing: A Reply to Fink, Marshall, Halligan, and Dolan
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2000; 12(2): 357 - 359.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Yamaguchi, S. Yamagata, and S. Kobayashi
Cerebral Asymmetry of the "Top-Down" Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features
J. Neurosci., May 1, 2000; 20(9): RC72 - RC72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by The MIT Press.