HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reingold, E. M. Articles by Stampe, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reingold, E. M. Articles by Stampe, D. M.

Saccadic Inhibition in Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades

University of Toronto

The present study investigated saccadic inhibition in both voluntary and stimulus-elicited saccades. Two experiments examined saccadic inhibition caused by an irrelevant flash occurring subsequent to target onset. In each trial, participants were required to perform a single saccade following the presentation of a black target on a gray background, 4° to the left or to the right of screen center. In some trials (flash trials), after a variable delay, a 33-msec flash was displayed at the top and bottom third of the monitor (these regions turned white). In all experimental conditions, histograms of flash-to-saccade latencies documented a decrease in saccadic frequency, forming a dip, time-locked to the flash and occurring as early as 60–70 msec following its onset. The fast latency of this effect strongly suggests a low-level, reflex-like, oculomotor effect, which was referred to as saccadic inhibition. A novel procedure was developed to allow comparisons of saccadic inhibition even across conditions, which in the absence of a flash (no-flash trials) produce dissimilar saccadic reaction times (SRTs) distributions. Experiment 1 examined the effects of the fixation stimulus on saccadic inhibition by contrasting three conditions: a gap condition (fixation stimulus disappeared 200 msec prior to target onset), a step condition (offset of the fixation stimulus was simultaneous with target onset), and an overlap condition (the fixation stimulus remained on for the duration of the trial). The overlap condition produced substantially stronger saccadic inhibition, relative to the gap and the step conditions. Experiment 2 contrasted the saccadic inhibition effect obtained for prosaccades (saccades aimed at the target) with the effect obtained for antisaccades (i.e., saccades aimed away from the same target). The onset of saccadic inhibition was earlier, and its magnitude was stronger, for antisaccades, relative to prosaccades. The plausibility that the superior colliculus is the neurophysiological locus of the saccadic inhibition effect was explored.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. HENDERSON and G. L. PIERCE Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations Psychon Bull Rev, June 1, 2008; 15(3): 566 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. R. Gottlob, M. T. Fillmore, and B. D. Abroms Age-Group Differences in Saccadic Interference J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2007; 62(2): P85 - P89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. White, K. R. Gegenfurtner, and D. Kerzel Effects of Structured Nontarget Stimuli on Saccadic Latency J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3214 - 3223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. Horwitz and T. D. Albright Short-Latency Fixational Saccades Induced by Luminance Increments J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 1333 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]