HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Senkfor, A. J. Articles by Kutas, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Senkfor, A. J. Articles by Kutas, M.

Episodic Action Memory for Real Objects: An ERP Investigation With Perform, Watch, and Imagine Action Encoding Tasks Versus a Non-Action Encoding Task

NMR Center–Massachussetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School

Cyma Van Petten

University of Arizona

Marta Kutas

University of California–San Diego

Cognitive research shows that people typically remember actions they perform better than those that they only watch or imagine doing, but also at times misremember doing actions they merely imagined or planned to do (source memory errors). Neural research suggests some overlap between brain regions engaged during action production, motor imagery, and action observation. The present study evaluates the similarities/differences in brain activity during the retrieval of various types of action and nonaction memories. Participants study real objects in one of four encoding conditions: performing an action, watching the experimenter perform an action, or imagining an action with an object, or a nonmotoric task of estimating an object's cost. At test, participants view color photos of the objects, and make source memory judgments about the initial encoding episodes. Event-related potentials (ERPs) during test reveal (1) content-specific brain activity depending on the nature of the encoding task, and (2) a hand tag, i.e., sensitivity to the hand with which an object had been manipulated at study. At fronto-central sites, ERPs are similar for the three action-retrieval conditions, which are distinct from those to the cost-encoded objects. At occipital sites ERPs distinguished objects from encoding conditions with visual motion (Perform and Watch) from those without visual motion (Imagine and Cost). Results thus suggest some degree of recapitulation of encoding brain activity during retrieval of memories with qualitatively distinct attributes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. CANSINO and P. TREJO-MORALES Neurophysiology of successful encoding and retrieval of source memory Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kiefer, E.-J. Sim, S. Liebich, O. Hauk, and J. Tanaka Experience-dependent Plasticity of Conceptual Representations in Human Sensory-Motor Areas. J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2007; 19(3): 525 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Y. Kuo and C. Van Petten Prefrontal Engagement during Source Memory Retrieval Depends on the Prior Encoding Task. J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2006; 18(7): 1133 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. I. Schubotz and D. Y. von Cramon Sequences of Abstract Nonbiological Stimuli Share Ventral Premotor Cortex with Action Observation and Imagery J. Neurosci., June 16, 2004; 24(24): 5467 - 5474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Herron and M. D. Rugg Retrieval Orientation and the Control of Recollection J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2003; 15(6): 843 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Van Petten, B. J. Luka, S. R. Rubin, and J. P. Ryan Frontal Brain Activity Predicts Individual Performance in an Associative Memory Exclusion Test Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2002; 12(11): 1180 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]