J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez-Duque, D.
Right arrow Articles by Neville, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez-Duque, D.
Right arrow Articles by Neville, H. J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15:491-507.)
© 2003 The MIT Press

Representation of Change: Separate Electrophysiological Markers of Attention, Awareness, and Implicit Processing

Diego Fernandez-Duque

University of Toronto

Giordana Grossi

State University of New York at New Paltz
University of Oregon

Ian M. Thornton

Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany

Helen J. Neville

University of Oregon

Awareness of change within a visual scene only occurs in the presence of focused attention. When two versions of a complex scene are presented in alternating sequence separated by a blank mask, unattended changes usually remain undetected, although they may be represented implicitly. To test whether awareness of change and focused attention had the same or separable neurophysiological substrates, and to search for the neural substrates of implicit representation of change, we recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) during a change blindness task. Relative to active search, focusing attention in the absence of a change enhanced an ERP component over frontal sites around 100–300 msec after stimulus onset, and in posterior sites at the 150–300 msec window. Focusing attention to the location of a change that subjects were aware of, replicated those attentional effects, but also produced a unique positive deflection in the 350–600 msec window, broadly distributed with its epicenter in medio-central areas. The unique topography and time course of this latter modulation, together with its dependence on the aware perception of change, distinguishes this "awareness of change" electrophysiological response from the electrophysiological effects of focused attention. Finally, implicit representation of change elicited a distinct electrophysiological event: Unaware changes triggered a positive deflection at the 240–300 msec window, relative to trials with no change. Overall, the present data suggest that attention, awareness of change, and implicit representation of change may be mediated by separate underlying systems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Wyart and C. Tallon-Baudry
Neural Dissociation between Visual Awareness and Spatial Attention
J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2667 - 2679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
G. Pourtois, M. De Pretto, C.-A. Hauert, and P. Vuilleumier
Time Course of Brain Activity during Change Blindness and Change Awareness: Performance is Predicted by Neural Events before Change Onset
J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2006; 18(12): 2108 - 2129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The MIT Press.