J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Caverni, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Caverni, J.-P.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15:508-522.)
© 2003 The MIT Press

Feedback in Hypothesis Testing: An ERP Study

David Papo

Université de Provence
CNRS

Pierre-Marie Baudonnière and Laurent Hugueville

CNRS

Jean-Paul Caverni

Université de Provence
CNRS

We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to probe the effects of feedback in a hypothesis testing (HT) paradigm. Thirteen college students serially tested hypotheses concerning a hidden rule by judging its presence or absence in triplets of digits and revised them on the basis of an exogenous performance feedback. ERPs time-locked to performance feedback were then examined. The results showed differences between responses to positive and negative feedback at all cortical sites. Negative feedback, indicating incorrect performance, was associated to a negative deflection preceding a P300-like wave. Spatiotemporal principal component analysis (PCA) showed the interplay between early frontal components and later central and posterior ones. Lateralization of activity was selectively detectable at frontal sites, with a left frontal dominance for both positive and negative feedback. These results are discussed in terms of a proposed computational model of trial-to-trial feedback in HT in which the cognitive and emotive aspects of feedback are explicitly linked to putative mediating brain mechanisms. The properties of different feedback types and feedback-related deficits in depression are also discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mem CognitHome page
S. HAN and I. G. DOBBINS
Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: Evidence for adaptive criterion learning
Mem Cognit, June 1, 2008; 36(4): 703 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. Papo, A. Douiri, F. Bouchet, J.-C. Bourzeix, J.-P. Caverni, and P.-M. Baudonniere
Time-Frequency Intracranial Source Localization of Feedback-Related EEG Activity in Hypothesis Testing
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1314 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The MIT Press.