HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gunter, T. C. Articles by Friederici, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gunter, T. C. Articles by Friederici, A. D.

Working Memory and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution as Revealed by ERPs: A Difficult Case for Activation Theories

Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience

This series of three event-related potential experiments explored the issue of whether the underlying mechanism of working memory (WM) supporting language processing is inhibitory or activational in nature. These different cognitive mechanisms have been proposed to explain the more efficient processing of subjects with a high WM span compared to those with a low WM span. Participants with high and low WM span were presented with sentences containing a homonym followed three words later by a nominal disambiguation cue and a final disambiguation using a verb. At the position of the disambiguation cue, inhibitory or activational WM mechanisms predict contrasting results. When activation is the underlying mechanism for efficient processing, the prediction is that high memory span persons activate both meanings of the homonym equally in WM, whereas low memory span persons only have one meaning present. When inhibition is the underlying mechanism, the predictions are the reverse. The ERP data, in particular, the variations of the meaning related N400 component, showed clear evidence for inhibition as the underlying cognitive mechanism in high-span readers. For low-span participants the cueing towards the dominant or the subordinate meaning elicited an equivalently large N400 component suggesting that both meanings are active in WM. In high-span subjects, the dominant disambiguation cue elicited a smaller N400 than the subordinate one, indicating that for these subjects particularly the dominant meaning is active. The experiments showed that inhibitory processes are probably underlying WM used during language comprehension in high-span subjects. Moreover, they demonstrate that these subjects can use their inhibition in a more flexible manner than low-span subjects. The effects that these processing differences have on the efficiency of language parsing are discussed.

Key Words: Semantics • ambiguous words • working memory • activation • inhibition • N400

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Holle and T. C. Gunter The Role of Iconic Gestures in Speech Disambiguation: ERP Evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1175 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Pylkkanen, R. Llinas, and G. L. Murphy The Representation of Polysemy: MEG Evidence J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2006; 18(1): 97 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Fiebach, S. H. Vos, and A. D. Friederici Neural Correlates of Syntactic Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension for Low and High Span Readers J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2004; 16(9): 1562 - 1575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]