HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schumacher, E. H. Articles by D'Esposito, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schumacher, E. H. Articles by D'Esposito, M.

Neural Evidence for Representation Specific Response Selection

University of California, Berkeley

Response selection is the mental process of choosing representations for appropriate motor behaviors given particular environmental stimuli and one's current task situation and goals. Many cognitive theories of response selection postulate a unitary process. That is, one central response-selection mechanism chooses appropriate responses in most, if not all, task situations. However, neuroscience research shows that neural processing is often localized based on the type of information processed. Our current experiments investigate whether response selection is unitary or stimulus specific by manipulating response-selection difficulty in two functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments using spatial and nonspatial stimuli. The same participants were used in both experiments. We found spatial response selection involves the right prefrontal cortex, the bilateral premotor cortex, and the dorsal parietal cortical regions (precuneus and superior parietal lobule). Nonspatial response selection, conversely, involves the left prefrontal cortex and the more ventral posterior cortical regions (left middle temporal gyrus, left inferior parietal lobule, and right extrastriate cortex). Our brain activation data suggest a cognitive model for response selection in which different brain networks mediate the choice of appropriate responses for different types of stimuli. This model is consistent with behavioral research suggesting that response-selection processing may be more flexible and adaptive than originally proposed.

Key Words: Attention • Prefrontal cortex • Executive control • Neuroimaging • Functional magnetic resonance imaging • Human performance

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. M. Morimoto, S. Hirose, J. Chikazoe, K. Jimura, T. Asari, K.-i. Yamashita, Y. Miyashita, and S. Konishi On Verbal/Nonverbal Modality Dependence of Left and Right Inferior Prefrontal Activation during Performance of Flanker Interference Task J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2008; 20(11): 2006 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Soldan, Y. Gazes, H. J. Hilton, and Y. Stern Aging Does Not Affect Brain Patterns of Repetition Effects Associated with Perceptual Priming of Novel Objects J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 20(10): 1762 - 1776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. U. Forstmann, W. P. M. van den Wildenberg, and K. R. Ridderinkhof Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 20(10): 1854 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Stelzel, A. Kraft, S. A. Brandt, and T. Schubert Dissociable Neural Effects of Task Order Control and Task Set Maintenance during Dual-task Processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 613 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Chambers, M. A. Bellgrove, I. C. Gould, T. English, H. Garavan, E. McNaught, M. Kamke, and J. B. Mattingley Dissociable Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Prefrontal and Premotor Cortex J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3638 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. T. Sun, L. M. Miller, A. A. Rao, and M. D'Esposito Functional Connectivity of Cortical Networks Involved in Bimanual Motor Sequence Learning Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1227 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Chen, P. Wei, and X. Zhou Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return. J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2006; 18(11): 1937 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. R. Heekeren, S. Marrett, D. A. Ruff, P. A. Bandettini, and L. G. Ungerleider Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality PNAS, June 27, 2006; 103(26): 10023 - 10028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Cavina-Pratesi, K. F. Valyear, J. C. Culham, S. Kohler, S. S. Obhi, C. A. Marzi, and M. A. Goodale Dissociating arbitrary stimulus-response mapping from movement planning during preparatory period: evidence from event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci., March 8, 2006; 26(10): 2704 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Talati and J. Hirsch Functional Specialization within the Medial Frontal Gyrus for Perceptual Go/No-Go Decisions Based on "What," "When," and "Where" Related Information: An fMRI Study J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2005; 17(7): 981 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Curtis, V. Y. Rao, and M. D'Esposito Maintenance of Spatial and Motor Codes during Oculomotor Delayed Response Tasks J. Neurosci., April 21, 2004; 24(16): 3944 - 3952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Jiang and N. Kanwisher Common Neural Substrates for Response Selection across Modalities and Mapping Paradigms J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2003; 15(8): 1080 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]