J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denys, K.
Right arrow Articles by Orban, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Denys, K.
Right arrow Articles by Orban, G. A.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:1505-1516.)
© 2004 The MIT Press

Visual Activation in Prefrontal Cortex is Stronger in Monkeys than in Humans

Katrien Denys

K.U. Leuven Medical School, Belgium

Wim Vanduffel

K.U. Leuven Medical School, Belgium
MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martino's Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA

Denis Fize, Koen Nelissen, Hiromasa Sawamura, Svetlana Georgieva and Rufin Vogels

K.U. Leuven Medical School, Belgium

David Van Essen

Washington University

Guy A. Orban

K.U. Leuven Medical School, Belgium

The prefrontal cortex supports many cognitive abilities, which humans share to some degree with monkeys. The specialized functions of the prefrontal cortex depend both on the nature of its inputs from other brain regions and on distinctive aspects of local processing. We used functional MRI to compare prefrontal activity between monkey and human subjects when they viewed identical images of objects, either intact or scrambled. Visual object-related activation of the lateral prefrontal cortex was observed in both species, but was stronger in monkeys than in humans, both in magnitude (factors 2–3) and in spatial extent (fivefold or more as a percentage of prefrontal volume). This difference was observed for two different stimulus sets, at two field strengths, and over a range of tasks. These results suggest that there may be more volitional control over visual processing in humans than in monkeys.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. M. Chen, G. H. Turner, R. M. Friedman, N. Zhang, J. C. Gore, A. W. Roe, and M. J. Avison
High-Resolution Maps of Real and Illusory Tactile Activation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Individual Monkeys with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Imaging
J. Neurosci., August 22, 2007; 27(34): 9181 - 9191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Sawamura, S. Georgieva, R. Vogels, W. Vanduffel, and G. A. Orban
Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys
J. Neurosci., April 27, 2005; 25(17): 4294 - 4306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The MIT Press.