J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.-Y.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:1669-1679.)
© 2004 The MIT Press

Learning to See Biological Motion: Brain Activity Parallels Behavior

Emily D. Grossman

University of California, Irvine,

Randolph Blake and Chai-Youn Kim

Vanderbilt University

Individuals improve with practice on a variety of perceptual tasks, presumably reflecting plasticity in underlying neural mechanisms. We trained observers to discriminate biological motion from scrambled (nonbiological) motion and examined whether the resulting improvement in perceptual performance was accompanied by changes in activation within the posterior superior temporal sulcus and the fusiform "face area," brain areas involved in perception of biological events. With daily practice, initially naive observers became more proficient at discriminating biological from scrambled animations embedded in an array of dynamic "noise" dots, with the extent of improvement varying among observers. Learning generalized to animations never seen before, indicating that observers had not simply memorized specific exemplars. In the same observers, neural activity prior to and following training was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neural activity within the posterior superior temporal sulcus and the fusiform "face area" reflected the participants' learning: BOLD signals were significantly larger after training in response both to animations experienced during training and to novel animations. The degree of learning was positively correlated with the amplitude changes in BOLD signals.


Key Words: Perception: high-level vision • learning • biological motion • superior temporal sulcus • fusiform gyrus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Schultz, L. Chuang, and Q. C. Vuong
A Dynamic Object-Processing Network: Metric Shape Discrimination of Dynamic Objects by Activation of Occipitotemporal, Parietal, and Frontal Cortices
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1302 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Pavlova, A. N. Sokolov, N. Birbaumer, and I. Krageloh-Mann
Perception and understanding of others' actions and brain connectivity.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2008; 20(3): 494 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
V. Lestou, F. E. Pollick, and Z. Kourtzi
Neural substrates for action understanding at different description levels in the human brain.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2008; 20(2): 324 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Pavlova, N. Birbaumer, and A. Sokolov
Attentional Modulation of Cortical Neuromagnetic Gamma Response to Biological Movement
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2006; 16(3): 321 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The MIT Press.