J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Linden, D. E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Linden, D. E. J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:355-366.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Separation of the Systems for Color and Spatial Manipulation in Working Memory Revealed by a Dual-task Procedure

Harald M. Mohr

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Germany

David E. J. Linden

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Germany
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany
University of Wales

The manipulation of different kinds of content is fundamental to working memory. It has been suggested that the mere maintenance of color and spatial information occurs in parallel, but little is known about whether this holds true for manipulation as well. Using a dual-task delayed-response paradigm that required the manipulation of color and angles, this study finds that the two functions do not interfere. Conversely, interference did occur when both components of a dual-task tapped into the spatial system. Thus, color and spatial information are manipulated in parallel. A concurrent phonological task did not interfere with either maintenance or manipulation, whereas a task requiring central executive processes interfered with manipulation only. We speculate that the ventral–dorsal dissociation of visual processing is conserved for manipulation processes and that manipulation differs from maintenance in the extent to which is relies on central executive resources.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav Res MethodsHome page
R. L. KLATZKY, N. A. GIUDICE, J. R. MARSTON, J. TIETZ, R. G. GOLLEDGE, and J. M. LOOMIS
An n-back task using vibrotactile stimulation with comparison to an auditory analogue
Behav Res Methods, February 1, 2008; 40(1): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
D. E.J. Linden
The Working Memory Networks of the Human Brain
Neuroscientist, June 1, 2007; 13(3): 257 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. M. Mohr, R. Goebel, and D. E. J. Linden
Content- and task-specific dissociations of frontal activity during maintenance and manipulation in visual working memory.
J. Neurosci., April 26, 2006; 26(17): 4465 - 4471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.