HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Longworth, C. E. Articles by Tyler, L. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Longworth, C. E. Articles by Tyler, L. K.

Getting to the Meaning of the Regular Past Tense: Evidence from Neuropsychology

¹ University of Cambridge, ² MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK

Reprint requests should be sent to C. E. Longworth, Centre for Speech and Language, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK, or via e-mail: cat{at}csl.psychol.cam.ac.uk.

Neuropsychological impairments of English past tense processing inform a key debate in cognitive neuroscience concerning the nature of mental mechanisms. Dual-route accounts claim that regular past tense comprehension deficits reflect a specific impairment of morphological decomposition (e.g., jump + ed), disrupting the automatic comprehension of word meaning accessed via the verb stem (e.g., jump). Single-mechanism accounts claim that the deficits reflect a general phonological impairment that affects perception of regular past tense offsets but which might preserve normal activation of verb semantics. We tested four patients with regular past tense deficits and matched controls, using a paired auditory semantic priming/lexical decision task with three conditions: uninflected verbs (hope/wish), regular past tense primes (blamed/accuse), and irregular past tense primes (shook/tremble). Both groups showed significant priming for verbs with simple morphophonology (uninflected verbs and irregular past tenses) but the patients showed no priming for verbs with complex morphophonology (regular past tenses) in contrast to controls. The findings suggest that the patients are delayed in activating the meaning of verbs if a regular past tense affix is appended, consistent with a dual-route account of their deficit.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. JUSTUS, J. LARSEN, P. D. M. DAVIES, and D. SWICK Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: Evidence from event-related potentials Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, June 1, 2008; 8(2): 178 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Desmurget, F. Bonnetblanc, and H. Duffau Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 898 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]