J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, S. D.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:1663-1665.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

A Moment to Reflect upon Perceptual Synchrony

Mark A. Elliott1, Zhuanghua Shi2 and Sean D. Kelly3

1 National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, 2 Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Munich, Germany, 3 Princeton University

Reprint requests should be sent to Mark A. Elliott, Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, or via e-mail: mark.elliott{at}nuigalway.ie.

How does neuronal activity bring about the interpretation of visual space in terms of objects or complex perceptual events? If they group, simple visual features can bring about the integration of spikes from neurons responding to different features to within a few milliseconds. Considered as a potential solution to the "binding problem," it is suggested that neuronal synchronization is the glue for binding together different features of the same object. This idea receives some support from correlated- and periodic-stimulus motion paradigms, both of which suggest that the segregation of a figure from ground is a direct result of the temporal correlation of visual signals. One could say that perception of a highly correlated visual structure permits space to be bound in time. However, on closer analysis, the concept of perceptual synchrony is insufficient to explain the conditions under which events will be seen as simultaneous. Instead, the grouping effects ascribed to perceptual synchrony are better explained in terms of the intervals of time over which stimulus events integrate and seem to occur simultaneously. This point is supported by the equivalence of some of these measures with well-established estimates of the perceptual moment. However, it is time in extension and not the instantaneous that may best describe how seemingly simultaneous features group. This means that studies of perceptual synchrony are insufficient to address the binding problem.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
A. Giersch, L. Lalanne, C. Corves, J. Seubert, Z. Shi, J. Foucher, and M. A. Elliott
Extended Visual Simultaneity Thresholds in Patients With Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull, March 21, 2008; (2008) sbn016v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.