HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Westen, D. Articles by Hamann, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Westen, D. Articles by Hamann, S.

Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Emotional Constraints on Partisan Political Judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election

Emory University

Reprint requests should be sent to Drew Westen, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Emory University, 532 N. Kilgo Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, or via e-mail: dwesten{at}emory.edu.

Research on political judgment and decision-making has converged with decades of research in clinical and social psychology suggesting the ubiquity of emotion-biased motivated reasoning. Motivated reasoning is a form of implicit emotion regulation in which the brain converges on judgments that minimize negative and maximize positive affect states associated with threat to or attainment of motives. To what extent motivated reasoning engages neural circuits involved in "cold" reasoning and conscious emotion regulation (e.g., suppression) is, however, unknown. We used functional neuroimaging to study the neural responses of 30 committed partisans during the U.S. Presidential election of 2004. We presented subjects with reasoning tasks involving judgments about information threatening to their own candidate, the opposing candidate, or neutral control targets. Motivated reasoning was associated with activations of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and lateral orbital cortex. As predicted, motivated reasoning was not associated with neural activity in regions previously linked to cold reasoning tasks and conscious (explicit) emotion regulation. The findings provide the first neuroimaging evidence for phenomena variously described as motivated reasoning, implicit emotion regulation, and psychological defense. They suggest that motivated reasoning is qualitatively distinct from reasoning when people do not have a strong emotional stake in the conclusions reached.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Fowler and D. Schreiber Biology, Politics, and the Emerging Science of Human Nature Science, November 7, 2008; 322(5903): 912 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Kedia, S. Berthoz, M. Wessa, D. Hilton, and J.-L. Martinot An Agent Harms a Victim: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on Specific Moral Emotions J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 20(10): 1788 - 1798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]