| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK, 2 University of Manchester, UK, 3 St Martin's Hospital, Bath, UK, 4 University of Wisconsin, Madison
Reprint requests should be sent to Karalyn Patterson, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 2EF, UK, or via e-mail: karalyn.patterson{at}mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk. Or to Timothy T. Rogers, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, or via e-mail: ttrogers{at}wisc.edu.
On the basis of a theory about the role of semantic knowledge in the recognition and production of familiar words and objects, we predicted that patients with semantic dementia would reveal a specific pattern of impairment on six different tasks typically considered "pre-" or "non-" semantic: reading aloud, writing to dictation, inflecting verbs, lexical decision, object decision, and delayed copy drawing. The prediction was that all tasks would reveal a frequency-by-typicality interaction, with patients performing especially poorly on lower-frequency items with atypical structure (e.g., words with an atypical spelling-to-sound relationship; objects with an atypical feature for their class, such as the hump on a camel, etc). Of 84 critical observations (14 patients performing 6 tasks), this prediction was correct in 84/84 cases; and a single component in a factor analysis accounted for 87% of the variance across seven measures: each patient's degree of impairment on atypical items in the six experimental tasks and a separate composite score reflecting his or her degree of semantic impairment. Errors also consistently conformed to the predicted pattern for both expressive and receptive tasks, with responses reflecting residual knowledge about the typical surface structure of each domain. We argue that these results cannot be explained as associated but unrelated deficits but instead are a principled consequence of a primary semantic impairment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Wilson, S. M. Brambati, R. G. Henry, D. A. Handwerker, F. Agosta, B. L. Miller, D. P. Wilkins, J. M. Ogar, and M. L. Gorno-Tempini The neural basis of surface dyslexia in semantic dementia Brain, November 20, 2008; (2008) awn300v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Hauk, K. Patterson, A. Woollams, E. Cooper-Pye, F. Pulvermuller, and T. T. Rogers How the Camel Lost Its Hump: The Impact of Object Typicality on Event-related Potential Signals in Object Decision. J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 19(8): 1338 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Noppeney, K. Patterson, L. K. Tyler, H. Moss, E. A. Stamatakis, P. Bright, C. Mummery, and C. J. Price Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: a comparison of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and semantic dementia Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 1138 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.-L. R. Adlam, K. Patterson, T. T. Rogers, P. J. Nestor, C. H. Salmond, J. Acosta-Cabronero, and J. R. Hodges Semantic dementia and fluent primary progressive aphasia: two sides of the same coin? Brain, November 1, 2006; 129(Pt 11): 3066 - 3080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Hauk, K. Patterson, A. Woollams, L. Watling, F. Pulvermuller, and T. T. Rogers [Q:] When would you prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP correlates of orthographic typicality and lexicality in written word recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 2006; 18(5): 818 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Crisp and M. A. Lambon Ralph Unlocking the nature of the phonological-deep dyslexia continuum: the keys to reading aloud are in phonology and semantics. J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 348 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| NEURAL COMPUTATION | J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |
