J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerlach, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gerlach, C.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007;19:296-314.)
© 2007 The MIT Press

A Review of Functional Imaging Studies on Category Specificity

Christian Gerlach

1 The Danish University of Education, and The National University Hospital, Denmark

Reprint requests should be sent to Christian Gerlach, Learning Lab Denmark, The Danish University of Education, Tuborgvej 164, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark, or via e-mail: cge.lld{at}dpu.dk.

A review of 20 functional imaging studies that compared visual processing of natural objects and artifacts in normal subjects is presented. The studies included fulfilled three criteria: (i) they used pictures as stimuli, (ii) they were based on direct contrasts between categories, and (iii) they reported findings in Talairach space. Not a single area is consistently activated for a given category across all studies. In contrast, 11 out of 29 regions are reported activated by both artifacts and natural objects. It is argued that the inconsistency is unlikely to reflect differences between studies in task requirements alone. Rather, the most likely causes of the inconsistency are: (i) adoption of liberal statistical thresholds that may yield false-positive activations, (ii) limited sensitivity due to few observations, and (iii) failure to match categories on confounding variables such as familiarity and visual complexity. Of the most consistent activations found, none appear to be selective for natural objects or artifacts. The findings reviewed are compatible with theories of category specificity that assume a widely distributed conceptual system not organized by category.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Kiefer, E.-J. Sim, B. Herrnberger, J. Grothe, and K. Hoenig
The Sound of Concepts: Four Markers for a Link between Auditory and Conceptual Brain Systems
J. Neurosci., November 19, 2008; 28(47): 12224 - 12230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
K. Hoenig, E.-J. Sim, V. Bochev, B. Herrnberger, and M. Kiefer
Conceptual Flexibility in the Human Brain: Dynamic Recruitment of Semantic Maps from Visual, Motor, and Motion-related Areas
J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 20(10): 1799 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The MIT Press.