HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weisberg, D. S. Articles by Gray, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Weisberg, D. S. Articles by Gray, J. R.

The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations

Yale University

Reprint requests should be sent to Deena Skolnick Weisberg, Department of Psychology, Yale University, P. O. Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, or via e-mail: deena.weisberg{at}yale.edu.

Explanations of psychological phenomena seem to generate more public interest when they contain neuroscientific information. Even irrelevant neuroscience information in an explanation of a psychological phenomenon may interfere with people's abilities to critically consider the underlying logic of this explanation. We tested this hypothesis by giving naïve adults, students in a neuroscience course, and neuroscience experts brief descriptions of psychological phenomena followed by one of four types of explanation, according to a 2 (good explanation vs. bad explanation) x 2 (without neuroscience vs. with neuroscience) design. Crucially, the neuroscience information was irrelevant to the logic of the explanation, as confirmed by the expert subjects. Subjects in all three groups judged good explanations as more satisfying than bad ones. But subjects in the two nonexpert groups additionally judged that explanations with logically irrelevant neuroscience information were more satisfying than explanations without. The neuroscience information had a particularly striking effect on nonexperts' judgments of bad explanations, masking otherwise salient problems in these explanations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Derks, M. Inzlicht, and S. Kang The Neuroscience of Stigma and Stereotype Threat Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 163 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Dovidio, A. R. Pearson, and P. Orr Social Psychology and Neuroscience: Strange Bedfellows or a Healthy Marriage? Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 247 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Power Character Animation and the Embodied Mind--Brain Animation, March 1, 2008; 3(1): 25 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]