J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludowig, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rosburg, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ludowig, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rosburg, T.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008;20:841-851.)
© 2008 The MIT Press

Intracranially Recorded Memory-related Potentials Reveal Higher Posterior than Anterior Hippocampal Involvement in Verbal Encoding and Retrieval

Eva Ludowig1, Peter Trautner1, Martin Kurthen2, Carlo Schaller1, Christian G. Bien1, Christian E. Elger1 and Timm Rosburg1

1 University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 2 Swiss Epilepsy Centre, Zurich, Switzerland

Reprint requests should be sent to Eva Ludowig, Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany, or via e-mail: Eva.Ludowig{at}ukb.uni-bonn.de.

The human hippocampus is essential for both encoding and recollection, but it remains controversial whether there is a functionally different involvement of anterior versus posterior parts of the hippocampus in these memory processes. In the present study, we examined encoding and retrieval processes via intrahippocampal recordings in 27 patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Multicontact depth electrodes were implanted along the longitudinal axis of the hippocampus as part of the presurgical evaluation. In a continuous word recognition test, subjects had to indicate whether words were new or already presented. Recognized old words, as compared to new words, resulted in a larger P600 component, as well as in a larger late negative component (LNC, 600–900 msec). In addition, subsequently remembered words elicited a larger positivity (400 to 900 msec) than later forgotten words. We found differences concerning the distribution along the hippocampus for the LNC old–new effect, reflecting successful retrieval, as well as for the subsequent memory effect, reflecting successful encoding. Both effects were larger the further posterior an electrode was located in the hippocampus. Findings are suggestive for a predominant posterior hippocampal involvement in both verbal encoding and retrieval.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The MIT Press.